Skip to content 6/27/2025 A Win for Parents at the Supreme Court and Why Nigeria Should become a Country of Particular Concern Jun 27 · 59 min ...more
6/27/2025 A Win for Parents at the Supreme Court and Why Nigeria Should become a Country of Particular Concern
June 27, 2025 · 59 min
Jody Hice and guests dissect and explain some Supreme Court Rulings and the Senate’s work on Budget Reconciliation, as well as concerns surrounding the brutal persecution of Christians in Nigeria.
Series Washington Watch with Tony Perkins - Video June 27, 2025 · 59 min · Washington Watch with Tony Perkins - Video
Jody Hice and guests dissect and explain some Supreme Court Rulings and the Senate’s work on Budget Reconciliation, as well as concerns surrounding the brutal persecution of Christians in Nigeria. ...more Show the full description Show less Jody Hice and guests dissect and explain some Supreme Court Rulings and the Senate’s work on Budget Reconciliation, as well as concerns surrounding the brutal persecution of Christians in Nigeria.
Series Washington Watch with Tony Perkins - Video Support this leader Liking this video? Support this ministry.
Support this leader
Liking this video? Support this ministry.
Give
Support this leader Liking this video? Support this ministry.
94K followers
Family Research Council is serving in the kingdom of God by championing faith, family, & freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview.
94K followers
Comments No comments yet. Start the conversation.
News Highlights and Supreme Court Decisions 0:06 Welcome to the Washington Watch news desk. I'm Zachary Goll with today's top stories. President Donald Trump strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities has been the source of much controversy this0:18 week. While liberal media outlets have questioned whether the attacks actually destroyed the facilities, president Trump and the Pentagon have been clear. The attacks were very successful.0:31 It was devastation underneath Fordow, and the amount of munitions, 6 per location. Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives.0:42 Still, the debate has raged on. But a recent report from the United Nations may put the argument to rest once and for all. A top nuclear official at the UN said0:54 the Iranian nuclear program, quote, suffered enormous damage. He went on to say, despite not having access to the facilities yet, we can draw fairly accurate1:06 conclusions by looking at satellite images about the type of damage and the consequences of what happened. In other news, 2 pivotal decisions were released by the1:18 Supreme Court today. The first needs some context. The Trump administration has been plagued with lower court injunctions, blocking president Trump's executive orders from actually taking1:30 effect. 1 order was to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants. Now when the order was blocked, the administration appealed and now won. Now the court1:42 didn't weigh in on the merits of the executive order, but it simply said that lower courts had overstepped their authority. Justice Amy Coney Barrett issued the majority opinion saying when a con when a1:54 court concludes that the executive branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power too. Now for the second case, it served2:05 as a massive victory for religious liberty. The court ruled in favor of parents who want to opt their children out of school lessons with LGBTQ themes. Justice2:17 Samuel Leto wrote in the majority opinion that the government had gone too far by requiring them to, quote, submit their children to instruction that poses a very real threat of undermining the religious2:29 beliefs and practices that the parents wish to instill. In other words, the government doesn't get to force children to learn something that's against the parents' religious beliefs.Political Developments and Budget Challenges 2:42 Now moving on from DC to New York. Socialist mayoral candidate, Ziran Mamdani, says he wants to spend 65000000 dollars in taxpayer2:54 money. What for? To pay for sex changes even for minors. Muldani's policy prescription is meant to replace the federal funding that the Trump administration is3:06 currently working to eliminate for said procedures. And speaking of the transgender issue, in a positive development that for defending female athletes, it's come from the Olympics.3:18 Trans identifying athletes competing against females has been a major source of controversy for years. But the new president of the International Olympic Committee has said there is quote,3:30 overwhelming support by the IOC to make changes.3:34 There was an overwhelmingly, support, I think, not just the the majority, but all of the members that were here are here present and those that were able to share with us, before3:46 before they left, that we should protect the female category. We understand that there will be differences depending on the sports, but it was fully agreed that as3:58 members and as the IOC, we should make the effort to place, emphasis on the protection of the female category.4:08 This new development could play a pivotal role in reestablishing both fair and safe competition for female athletes. And those are today's headlines. I'm4:20 Zachary Goll. You can dive deeper with the Washington stand at washington stand dot com. You can also watch this and other news on the Stand Firm mobile app, which you can find in the App Store. Also, follow us on social4:32 media for updates at f r c d c. Up next is Washington Watch with guest host Jody Heiss. We're back next week with more stories that matter.4:53 From the heart of our nation's capital in Washington, DC, bringing compelling interviews, insightful analysis, taking you beyond the headlines and sound bites into conversations with our nation's leaders and newsmakers,5:05 all from a biblical world view. Sitting in for Tony is today's host, Jody Heise.5:11 Good afternoon. Welcome to this Friday, June 20 seventh edition of Washington Watch. I am your Friday host, Jody Heise, a senior fellow here at the Family Research Council, and an5:23 honor deeply to have you on board with us today. We've got a lot to cover. Here are some of the highlights. There were some huge decisions that were released by the US Supreme Court today,5:35 including 1 that significantly curtails the use of nationwide injunctions by rogue activist judges.5:43 Americans are finally getting what they voted for. No longer will we have rogue judges striking down president Trump's policies across the entire nation. No5:55 longer. Today in the 6 3 opinion, justice Barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions.6:07 That was US attorney general Pam Bondi earlier today, and I'll discuss this in just a moment when I'm joined by Maryland congressman doctor Andy Harris. And he'll also give us his take6:19 on how the so called big beautiful bill is shaping up in the senate. Well, will congressional Republicans be able to get the bill to the president's desk by Independence Day?6:29 We are very, very close. And and, leader Thune has confidence that they could, get the job done by this weekend, and we certainly are hopeful for that. We would still like to meet that July fourth, self imposed deadline,6:40 and and, the president likes that idea. I certainly like idea that idea and so does the other 1. So we're gonna wait and see posture in the house right here, and and we'll see what happens.6:49 So we're ready to have That was house speaker Mike Johnson earlier today. So what might happen with all this? Well, we'll be discussing that here in just a7:01 few moments. And then there were some other huge decisions that were released by the Supreme Court today that were met with cheers from freedom loving Americans.7:11 Another great decision that came down today, the Trans Books case, which restores parents' rights to decide their child's education. That ruling allows parents to opt out of of dangerous trans ideology and7:23 make the decisions for their children that they believe is correct.7:27 That was deputy attorney general Todd Blanch, and we'll be discussing the case that he referenced in the ruling when I'm joined by Daniel Smith of Liberty Counsel a little bit later in the program. And, by the way,7:39 this will also be part of my weekly Biblical Worldview Conversation with FRC's David Clausen. We'll also talk about how the court's ruling on planned parenthood came down as7:51 well as an age verification for pornography. So a lot coming down from the Supreme Court. Why president Trump8:03 should designate Nigeria as a country of particular concern. So we've got a lot, an awful lot coming your way, a packed program if you miss any part of it. Of course, our website is8:15 tony perkins dot com, and you can catch anything you happen to miss right there, tony perkins dot com. Alright. Let's jump into our first topic. Republican senators are scurrying all over the place to8:27 try to get the so called big beautiful budget bill across the finish line, but there certainly are some roadblocks in the way such as the senate parliamentarian's8:39 ruling against the bill's Medicaid provisions. That's a biggie, friends. Can the senate pull everything together at the last minute? And what happens if they don't? Well, here to8:51 discuss this and more is congressman Andy Harris, who is the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, and he's also a member of the GOP Doctors Caucus. He represents the first congressional district of Maryland.9:04 Congressman Harris, welcome back to Washington Watch. Always great to have you.9:08 Yeah. Great to be with you, Jody.9:11 Alright. So, first of all, let me get your your, basic reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling earlier today that limited nationwide injunctions from federal courts. Why9:23 is this, such a big decision?9:26 Well, that's a very big decision because that that's the weapon that's been used against president Trump's conservative policies. Every time they come out with a conservative policy, they, judge shop. They find a liberal9:36 judge somewhere in the district court level, and that district court judge way oversteps their bounds, and that was the major finding in today's, case. They way overstep their bounds, and then they put a hold on that,9:48 that that policy nationwide. That's ridiculous. These are district judges. Their districts are small. Sometimes they don't even encompass a whole state, and yet they were making rulings that that concern the entire9:59 nation.10:01 Wow. Yeah. So, I mean, talk about legislating from the bench. When you have 1 of these lower courts making decisions and then kinda pushing it to become nationwide policy or a decision10:12 that affects the entire nation, that's huge. So this, that really is a a a big deal. Let let's kinda bring back to congress. We've got so much, congressman Harris, I'd like to talk to you about. But, of course,10:24 you're chairman of the the Freedom Caucus. What concerns do you and the Freedom Caucus have regarding the the current version of the senate reconciliation bill?10:36 Well, the the the problem is is that it leaves a huge hole in the budget. The bottom line is that as it left the house, given that we do expect some economic growth, I think that, we would have we10:47 would have had a balanced budget. Well, we wouldn't have increased the deficit with the bill, but I think when it went over to the senate, they added, more tax, more lowering of taxes, which, of course, some of those10:59 lower taxes will decrease revenue. And then, the senate parliamentarian over the last few, few, days has, said that a lot of our, deficit reduction measures were invalid under the Byrd11:11 rule. They'll have they'll have to be changed and modified. Hopefully, they can get that done the next, couple of days, but, we really can't be adding to the to the budget deficit. You know, we all wanna extend the tax11:21 cuts, and we get that that results in some economic growth. But when all is said and done, we think that we should at least we shouldn't increase the budget deficits. I'd like to lower them. I think there's plenty of11:32 places in the federal government we can cut spending. But, again, at this point in time, the the balance the balance sheet doesn't balance, and and I think it's gonna have to balance when it comes back to the house.11:44 Wow. So so you see a bumpy road ahead for this bill. Is that what you're saying?11:50 Over the next couple of days, it will be. I think we'll know by the end of the weekend. I think they will have attempt to have ironed out the problems with the parliamentarian. I think they'll have, gone ahead and and11:59 then can, again, begin to balance the books within the bill. And if they can do that, you know, maybe we can hit the July fourth deadline. I think if they can't do that, if if they try to send it over to the house with a12:10 large increase in in the budget deficit, then I think it's it's it's we're gonna have to go back to some point on the drawing board and make sure that, things balance out.12:21 Yeah. I agree with you. I don't see how it makes it through the house again without some of those changes you're talking about. Let's go down the path. You're you're a a physician. Break can you break down for us? I12:31 don't think everybody fully understands the Medicaid dispute, that that's taking place and even taking place among some of your Republican colleagues.12:41 Well, Medicaid, the problem, Jody, is that we increase Medicaid spending by about 50 percent over the past 10 years, and that's in in in actual dollars. I mean, we we spend a lot on Medicaid right now, and it's because12:53 some of the states have figured out ways to spend way more money on, healthy young people who are added to Medicaid under Obamacare than it spends on the what we call the traditional Medicaid13:05 population, which are the which are the needy, the disabled, the elderly, the, pregnant women, their children. The bottom line is these were the were the core functions of Medicaid. The program has wandered way13:17 far from those core functions, and, the Medicaid spending at the federal level because of that is out of control. So, again, we're attempting to put in some measures that allow us to continue to increase13:28 spending, but not at that rate, because that rate is unaffordable.13:33 Wow. So you mentioned a while ago the the senate parliamentarian. Alright. Here's an individual that carries a pretty big stick, but you you mentioned specifically the parliamentarian saying that some of the,13:45 measures within the bill violated the Byrd rule. Can you break that down for us, for some folks who may not understand what the Byrd rule is?13:55 So, the what what, we use the reconciliation bill in order to avoid the what the 60 vote filibuster threshold in the senate because we only have 53 senators on the Republican side.14:07 Obviously, we can't get some a lot of the president Trump's agenda done, in the senate unless we had 60 senators, and we don't have them. So under reconciliation rules, we only need 51 senators. But that but14:19 under reconciliation, everything has to be budget related. You can't do something purely for a policy reason. If it has a it has a significant connection to the, to the balancing the budget,14:30 for instance, the balancing the books, then, yes, it's it can be included in reconciliation. So sometimes it's how you word it. You know, 2 examples is 1 is is, we we thought we would take some of the,14:43 loopholes allowing people not to have to repay their student loans, people who really should be repaying their student loans. They took it. They signed for it. They should be repaying them. And this and the way it was14:53 worded, the Senate parliamentarians said, well, this, you know, this doesn't follow the Byrd rule. I don't understand that because this involved, you know, dollars 120000000000 of savings to the federal government with15:04 people repaying these, the some of these student loans. But, again, that's that's an example of where the parliamentarian increased the budget deficit from what we sent over, from the15:16 house and, and put the whole bill out of balance.15:20 Wow. So at the end of the day, do you think the senate bill is going to be drastically different from the house version? Or at this point, are they going to be, coming closer to the15:32 house version to get this across the finish line?15:35 Well, Jody, I'm hoping they come closer to the house version because we we worked long and hard to get it out of the house to the senate. We think it was a very carefully negotiated, compromise. And as they wander away15:46 from that, it becomes less and less likely that it's gonna succeed when it comes back, to the house. We want this to succeed. We want president Trump to succeed, but it the safest thing they could do is take our house15:57 bill and just pass it, the the way the way we pass it or make some very small changes. It may end up there. We'll know by the end of the weekend.16:04 Yep. I agree with you. That would be the the safest way to go. So, as I understand at this point, the senate scheduled to have their so called vote a rama on this thing, over the weekend. Do you think they're16:16 gonna meet the deadline? And I maybe what what happens if they don't?16:23 You know, it's it's unclear that they'll get to the Votorama over the weekend. They may just do what we call the motion to proceed, which just begins the debate on the bill. It it may be Monday or Tuesday even16:35 when they do the Vodorama. Look. If they don't if they don't hit the deadline exactly, it is an it is a somewhat artificial deadline. We know that we do hit the debt ceiling, sometime in August, probably the end of16:47 August, so that's a real hard deadline. We absolutely have to raise the debt ceiling by that date. But July fourth is is, you know, an artificial deadline. It it's it's a good deadline to have. It it makes16:59 us work harder, toward a deadline. But, if it slips by a few days or even into the week after, that that wouldn't be a disaster. It would be just fine. You know, the it's this is such a17:11 large bill that we should actually take a little time to make sure we get it right.17:15 Yep. Alright. Before I let you go, I I know there was a a briefing today on the US, targeted strikes on Iran. Much of that, if not all of it, classified. I know you're limited on whatInternational Concerns and Religious Freedom 17:27 you can share. But is there any any information that you can share, from, not necessarily the briefing, but just overall your your thoughts on the the targeted strikes on17:39 Iran?17:41 Absolutely. Look, the world has to remember that, radical Islamic terrorism raised its head on 9 11. It's still around. It's embodied in Iran. And I think, this summary I would say is the17:52 world should sleep a little safer, tonight and every night, now that Iran is not gonna have a nuclear weapon anytime in the near future.18:02 Well, that is encouraging, and, it's, you know, there's no lack of of news to cover. And, congressman Andy Harris, I wanna thank you for, the18:14 incredible you work that you do in congress for your own state, your district, through the House Freedom Caucus, the Doctors Caucus, and a host of other places where you serve, and we deeply appreciate you coming on18:26 Washington Watch and breaking some of this stuff down for us.18:29 Thank you, Jody.18:31 Alright. Coming up next, the US Supreme Court rules in favor of parents who are wanting their kids to be exempt from forced indoctrination of LGBT18:43 ideology. Wow. Stay with us to hear what this might mean for parents as well as religious freedoms. We'll be back.18:53 Hi, everyone. This is pastor Jay Johnston, national prayer director with the Family Research Council. I wanna invite you to join our 21 day family bible challenge as we read19:05 through the book of Matthew. This is an opportunity for you and for your family to come together for 15 minutes a day to read God's word together. Deuteronomy19:17 6 says, these commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you19:29 lie down and when you get up. Seek the word of God. Obey the word of God. Share the word of God so that you and others might know the joy of walking with God now19:41 and for all eternity. As your family gathers to read the Bible, invite the Holy Spirit to work in your life to spiritually transform each 1 of19:53 you. Ask the Lord to show you creative ways for you to connect with your family to read God's word together. I pray that however God uses this20:04 challenge in your life and those that you join together with will be a blessing to you and strengthen you as you read the gospel of Matthew together. Visit frc dot20:16 o r g slash family bible challenge for more information.20:23 In a time when Washington seems clouded by compromise, a bold group of lawmakers are standing firm in defense of the values which our nation was built upon. At FRC actions20:35 100 percent awards, 171 members of congress were honored for voting 100 percent in line with policies that promote faith, family, and freedom.20:47 Faith and family made our country it's the foundation that made our country not only great, but good.20:53 The values that make America, faith, family, hard work, first responsibility. I mean, that to me is the heart of FRC and, grateful for everything that they do.21:02 It's very important for us to have organizations such as FRC. First of all, I think it keeps us grounded. In addition to which, the issues that you champion are issues that we should all be championing.21:12 FRC is very, very good at honing in on those things that, really affect Christians' lives. Also, working with members of Congress too to make sure that those values are instilled in the legislation that we create.21:23 Having the Family Research Council to guide us is critically important to being able to do the right thing consistently.21:32 These lawmakers have drawn the line, not just in policy, but in principle. This is more than politics. This is conviction in action. Visit f r c action dot org for21:44 more information on how you too can make a difference.21:54 Thank you so much for joining us today. Welcome back to Washington Watch. I am your Friday host, Jody Hice, and so glad to have you on board with us. By the way, we have right now right now, team members are22:06 standing by to take your call. If you would like to support and be a partner of Washington Watch and the Family Research Council, right now, I've got some good news. You can make a22:18 gift before the end of this month, and it will be doubled. Friends, it doesn't get any better than that. Double your gift. Please give us a call right now at 802 2 522:29 4 0 0 8, and thank you in advance for your support. Alright. The Supreme Court this morning delivered several22:42 welcomed rulings, including 1 for parents as well as for religious freedom. The case Mahmood v Taylor. In that case, parents now from various religious backgrounds, well, they all22:54 banded together. They were challenging the Montgomery County Public Schools Elementary story hours. You may recall we've reported on it, but that that story hour promoted books on things like23:06 pride parades, gender transitions, and various LGBT themes. Well, today, in a 6 3 ruling, the Supreme Court justices backed the parents who23:18 took a stand trying to protect their children from these radical agendas. So what was the reason for the ruling? And probably more important, what might be the impact of all of23:29 this? Well, here to discuss this case is Daniel Smith. He's a constitutional attorney and associate vice president of legal affairs with Liberty Council. And by the way, Liberty Council filed23:41 an amicus brief in this case. Daniel, welcome back to Washington Watch. Great to have you and great news today.23:48 It was good news, and thank you for having me, Judd.23:52 Okay. So let's begin. Just walk us through the the ruling from this case. What actually did the Supreme Court say?24:00 Well, what they said was is that just because you drop your child off at a public school, doesn't mean you forfeit the right to direct their religious upbringing. We decided24:12 that issue about 53 years ago in Wisconsin versus Yoder, but it has come back up in the curriculum based education for elementary school24:23 children. And the question being whether you could have a religious opt out to curriculums that parents find religiously objectionable. The supreme court rightly held today24:35 that, of course, they do. The first amendment affords parents the right to direct the religious upbringing of their children, and they don't surrender that at the schoolhouse gate.24:47 So what was the bottom line of this case? In other words, was this a case about parental rights, or was it a case about religious freedom and the right to parents to pass24:59 the baton of that religious faith onto the children? How would you describe what ultimately this case was all about?25:07 Well, it's based on the free exercise clause of the first amendment. But what I would say is in this regard, the free exercise of religion and the fundamental rights of parents are25:19 inextricably intertwined when it comes to this. So for many parents, the right to raise their children according to the dictates of their faith prevent25:31 them from hearing some of the obscene materials that were read to elementary school children and require that they don't promote what the Bible says and what other religious25:43 faiths of the parents in this case say are sin and are forbidden. The teachers were teaching curriculum that violates what the parents were teaching at home. They have the free exercise25:55 right and the parental right, both of which are constitutionally grounded, to opt their children out of that curriculum. The Maryland County Public Schools tried to26:07 say you can't have an opt out. They prohibited it. And, oh, by the way, we won't even provide you notice when we're going to read these stories to your children. The Supreme Court this morning said you can't do that.26:18 Okay. Yeah. So let's let's go down that path because I think this is fascinating. Everything you just said is just so much common sense. I mean, it's to me, it sounds kind of amazing that we're even having this kind of26:29 case go all the way to the Supreme Court. But what was the argument from the other side? Why in the world did they believe that parents should not be allowed to take their kids out of a class that teaches this type26:41 of stuff?26:42 This is the most comical part of it all if you ask me, Jody, and Justice Alito does a good job, dissecting it. What the Montgomery County Public School said was26:59 begat is that there are too many parents who object to their 3 and 4 and 5 year olds reading about Pride Puppy and some of the other obscene materials that it becomes unworkable for27:11 us. Then what justice Alito says is we don't get to create a problem and then deprive people of constitutional rights because the problem's too big.27:29 Entire argument for why they could prohibit an opt in.27:38 Closely watched case for religious freedom advocates, at least. So big big term, 30000 foot view. What does this ruling mean for religious freedom?27:50 I think it has major implications for religious freedom, not the least of which is there are millions of parents who enjoy the public benefit of the public education28:02 system. We can debate the merits of that all day long. That's have me back and we'll have a different discussion about that. But for purposes of today, those who take their children to a public education28:14 institution don't surrender their First Amendment rights when they drop them off. If the school and a radical school board and radical teachers want to impose a curriculum that28:26 violates the religious beliefs of the parents, they have the right to say no, and they have the right to opt their children out. The first amendment demands that, common sense demands that, and thankfully, the supreme28:37 court today demanded that.28:40 Less than a minute left. I wish we had more because there's so much I'd like to get into, but the supreme court this morning also upheld a Texas law requiring age verification for access to Internet porn sites. Real28:51 quickly, your thoughts on that decision?28:54 I think that's pretty common sense, Jody. We we have age restriction and age verification requirements for all manner of things, driver's licenses, purchasing various items in the store, registering to29:06 vote, obtaining access to obscene materials that has become rampant. The court notes today has become rampant because of the proliferation of the internet and cell29:18 phones and, websites that are all over the place. Texas said we're going to require you to have an age verification requirement. The Supreme Court says the First Amendment doesn't prohibit that. We've allowed that for29:29 years, and they allowed it again today.29:31 Daniel Smith, associate vice president of legal affairs at Liberty Council. Thank you so much. Great news coming out of the Supreme Court today. Appreciate you Thank you, Joe. Bringing it to us. Alright. After this,29:43 Nigeria, a country of particular concern. Find out why or why not right after the break.29:54 The Center for Biblical Worldviews all day workshops delves into the formation of a worldview, what it is, how it's formed, when it's formed, what that means to them personally and their30:06 churches and communities.30:07 My hope for people when they come to these worldview workshops is that they will come away better equipped to engage the people and the ideas that they're living with and around. And our30:19 goal is to give people more confidence in the gospel and the fact that what God said to us actually is true, actually is the path to happiness and human flourishing for all of us, but also30:31 more confidence in their ability to have these conversations and help lead other people to the truth.30:37 For bible believing Christians to know what God's word says on these issues and to learn how they can apply it to their lives. And we believe that the more Christians that we equip, that's how we'll change the30:49 nation.30:50 Hey, fam. Listen. Pastor Sammy here at Lighthouse Church, and I cannot tell you how equipping, how empowering, how incredibly educating this conference has been. And so31:02 I just wanna encourage anybody that either has not been part of or is thinking about hosting this event, certainly to pastors, leaders, even CEOs for that matter. This conference is lights31:14 out. Stand behind it myself. I can't commend it enough. We're gonna be talking about this for some time to come.31:20 The culture is kind of squeezing in on us as god's people, forcing those of us with biblical views, to change those views or to suppress those views. It's forcing us to engage31:31 with issues that we've never had to engage with. And so what this teaches us is what those issues are, what the bible says about those issues, and then how we can critically engage our culture on these things31:43 in a way that is committed to biblical principle.31:46 Visit f r c dot org slash world view for more information.31:55 Welcome back to Washington Watch. Great to have you today. Appreciate you joining us and entrusting this hour of your time to us. I wanna remind you to, we have teamShow more In this video 0:00 News Highlights and Supreme Court Decisions2:32 Political Developments and Budget Challenges17:16 International Concerns and Religious Freedom31:56 Supreme Court Rulings and Parental Rights
Comments
Keep it kind. Comments are public.